linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 04/16] iommu: Cleanup iopf data structure definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240125134429.GO1455070@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:44:29 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Longfang Liu <liulongfang@...wei.com>,
	Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/16] iommu: Cleanup iopf data structure definitions

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:33:45PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> > check. Is the drop intended? and if so, should we just get rid of
> > IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_PASID_VALID?
> 
> In my opinion, we should keep this hardware detail in the individual
> driver. When the page fault handling framework in IOMMU and IOMMUFD
> subsystems includes a valid PASID in the fault message, the response
> message should also contain the *same* PASID value. Individual drivers
> should be responsible for deciding whether to include the PASID in the
> messages they provide for the hardware.

+1

Jason