linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-mcu/wakeup: Disable MCU and wakeup R5FSS nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240125140438.lmjrjzxqoy5lgsir@corset>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:04:38 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@...com>
CC: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>,
        <kristo@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <bb@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-mcu/wakeup: Disable MCU and
 wakeup R5FSS nodes

On 11:17-20240125, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
> Hi Nishanth,
> 
> On 24/01/24 22:51, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 11:26-20240124, Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
> > > Hello Vaishnav,
> > > 
> > > On 21/01/24 19:10, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
> > > > K3 Remoteproc R5 driver requires reserved memory carveouts and
> > > > mailbox configuration to instantiate the cores successfully.
> > > > Since this is a board level dependency, keep the R5 subsytem
> > > > disabled at SoC dtsi, otherwise it results in probe errors like
> > > > below during AM62P SK boot:
> > > > 
> > > > r5fss@...00000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
> > > > r5fss@...00000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22
> > > > r5fss@...00000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
> > > > r5fss@...00000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: b5080c7c1f7e ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: Add nodes for more IPs")
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@...com>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
> > > 
> > > > ---
> > > >    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi    | 2 ++
> > > >    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi | 1 +
> > > >    2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> > > > index c4b0b91d70cf..14eb9ba836d3 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> > > > @@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ mcu_r5fss0: r5fss@...00000 {
> > > >    		ranges = <0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x8000>,
> > > >    			 <0x79020000 0x00 0x79020000 0x8000>;
> > > >    		power-domains = <&k3_pds 7 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> > > > +		status = "disabled";
> > > > +
> > > >    		mcu_r5fss0_core0: r5f@...00000 {
> > > >    			compatible = "ti,am62-r5f";
> > > >    			reg = <0x79000000 0x00008000>,
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
> > > > index 19f42b39394e..10a7059b2d9b 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
> > > > @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ wkup_r5fss0: r5fss@...00000 {
> > > >    		ranges = <0x78000000 0x00 0x78000000 0x8000>,
> > > >    			 <0x78100000 0x00 0x78100000 0x8000>;
> > > >    		power-domains = <&k3_pds 119 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> > > > +		status = "disabled";
> > 
> > Is there a reason for difference in white space addition?
> > 
> 
> For mcu_r5fss0_core0 child node there was no blank line as per the
> recommended coding style : https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst#n124
> 
> So I added a newline there and wkup_r5fss0 already had it correct, since the
> change was trivial it was not mentioned in commit message.
> 

For some reason i was misled to think that the EoL spacing was messed
up. Looking at
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240121134017.374992-1-vaishnav.a@ti.com/ i
realise it is being fixed properly in the patch. Oops.. my bad.


Reviewed-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D