linux-kernel - Re: 回复：general protection fault in ath9k_wmi_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:11:54 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
Cc: Ubisectech Sirius <bugreport@...sectech.com>,  linux-trace-kernel
 <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,  linux-kernel
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,  johannes <johannes@...solutions.net>,
    linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 回复：general protection fault in
 ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk> writes:

> "Ubisectech Sirius" <bugreport@...sectech.com> writes:
>
>>>Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is
>>>another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit:
>>>8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at
>>> ath9k_htc_tx_get_packet()")
>>>Could you please test the patch below and see if you can still reproduce
>>>this issue with that applied?
>> Hello.
>>  I can not reproduce the issue on the Linux with the patch applied
>> Ubisectech Sirius Team
>
> Great, thank you for testing! I'll send a proper patch. How would you
> like to be credited with reporting? Just as 'Ubisectech Sirius
> <bugreport@...sectech.com>' ?

Ubisectech, please CC linux-wireless on any wireless issues and don't
use HTML format in emails. More info in the wiki below.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches