linux-kernel - Re: 回复：general protection fault in ath9k_wmi_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:22:08 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: Ubisectech Sirius <bugreport@...sectech.com>, linux-trace-kernel
 <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, johannes <johannes@...solutions.net>,
 linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 回复：general protection fault in
 ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet

Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> writes:

> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk> writes:
>
>> "Ubisectech Sirius" <bugreport@...sectech.com> writes:
>>
>>>>Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is
>>>>another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit:
>>>>8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at
>>>> ath9k_htc_tx_get_packet()")
>>>>Could you please test the patch below and see if you can still reproduce
>>>>this issue with that applied?
>>> Hello.
>>>  I can not reproduce the issue on the Linux with the patch applied
>>> Ubisectech Sirius Team
>>
>> Great, thank you for testing! I'll send a proper patch. How would you
>> like to be credited with reporting? Just as 'Ubisectech Sirius
>> <bugreport@...sectech.com>' ?
>
> Ubisectech, please CC linux-wireless on any wireless issues and don't
> use HTML format in emails. More info in the wiki below.

Doh, didn't even notice that linux-wireless was not in Cc. Sorry about
that! :(

-Toke