linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Add missing line break in test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <170629682579.29810.16491106487245161634.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 19:20:25 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Add missing line break in
 test_verifier

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>:

On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:57:36 +0800 you wrote:
> There are no break lines in the test log for test_verifier #106 ~ #111
> if jit is disabled, add the missing line break at the end of printf()
> to fix it.
> 
> Without this patch:
> 
>   [root@...ux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
>   [root@...ux bpf]# ./test_verifier 106
>   #106/p inline simple bpf_loop call SKIP (requires BPF JIT)Summary: 0 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Add missing line break in test_verifier
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fa7178b0f12e

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html