[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240126015736.655-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:57:36 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Add missing line break in test_verifier
There are no break lines in the test log for test_verifier #106 ~ #111
if jit is disabled, add the missing line break at the end of printf()
to fix it.
Without this patch:
[root@...ux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
[root@...ux bpf]# ./test_verifier 106
#106/p inline simple bpf_loop call SKIP (requires BPF JIT)Summary: 0 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
With this patch:
[root@...ux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
[root@...ux bpf]# ./test_verifier 106
#106/p inline simple bpf_loop call SKIP (requires BPF JIT)
Summary: 0 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Fixes: 0b50478fd877 ("selftests/bpf: Skip callback tests if jit is disabled in test_verifier")
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
---
I am not sure whether the Fixes tag is necessary, you can remove it
if it is useless, thank you.
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index e1a1dfe8d7fa..df04bda1c927 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
int i, err;
if ((test->flags & F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED) && jit_disabled) {
- printf("SKIP (requires BPF JIT)");
+ printf("SKIP (requires BPF JIT)\n");
skips++;
sched_yield();
return;
--
2.42.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists