linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next v3] net: tcp: accept old ack during closing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240126040519.1846345-1-menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 12:05:19 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
	dsahern@...nel.org,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3] net: tcp: accept old ack during closing

For now, the packet with an old ack is not accepted if we are in
FIN_WAIT1 state, which can cause retransmission. Taking the following
case as an example:

    Client                               Server
      |                                    |
  FIN_WAIT1(Send FIN, seq=10)          FIN_WAIT1(Send FIN, seq=20, ack=10)
      |                                    |
      |                                Send ACK(seq=21, ack=11)
   Recv ACK(seq=21, ack=11)
      |
   Recv FIN(seq=20, ack=10)

In the case above, simultaneous close is happening, and the FIN and ACK
packet that send from the server is out of order. Then, the FIN will be
dropped by the client, as it has an old ack. Then, the server has to
retransmit the FIN, which can cause delay if the server has set the
SO_LINGER on the socket.

Old ack is accepted in the ESTABLISHED and TIME_WAIT state, and I think
it should be better to keep the same logic.

In this commit, we accept old ack in FIN_WAIT1/FIN_WAIT2/CLOSING/LAST_ACK
states. Maybe we should limit it to FIN_WAIT1 for now?

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
---
v3:
- fix unsigned/signed compare error
v2:
- fix the compiling error
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index df7b13f0e5e0..2d20edf652e6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -6699,17 +6699,21 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* step 5: check the ACK field */
-	acceptable = tcp_ack(sk, skb, FLAG_SLOWPATH |
-				      FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT |
-				      FLAG_NO_CHALLENGE_ACK) > 0;
+	reason = tcp_ack(sk, skb, FLAG_SLOWPATH |
+				  FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT |
+				  FLAG_NO_CHALLENGE_ACK);
 
-	if (!acceptable) {
+	if ((int)reason <= 0) {
 		if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV)
 			return 1;	/* send one RST */
-		tcp_send_challenge_ack(sk);
-		SKB_DR_SET(reason, TCP_OLD_ACK);
-		goto discard;
+		/* accept old ack during closing */
+		if ((int)reason < 0) {
+			tcp_send_challenge_ack(sk);
+			reason = -reason;
+			goto discard;
+		}
 	}
+	SKB_DR_SET(reason, NOT_SPECIFIED);
 	switch (sk->sk_state) {
 	case TCP_SYN_RECV:
 		tp->delivered++; /* SYN-ACK delivery isn't tracked in tcp_ack */
-- 
2.39.2