linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Introduce additional tsens instances

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:00:12 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Introduce additional tsens
 instances

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:31:06AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 1/19/24 00:00, Bjorn Andersson wrote:

> > +		gpu-thermal {
> > +			polling-delay-passive = <250>;
> > +			polling-delay = <1000>;
> 
> Hm, did tsens only gain support of non-polled reporting with 8450?
> 
> If not, we should definitely update all the relevant SoCs.

Did you determine whether the interrupts work as expected?

We don't want to be polling here unless we have to (i.e. polling-delay
should be 0 as per the binding).

Johan