linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Introduce additional tsens instances

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:48:03 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
 Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Introduce additional tsens
 instances



On 1/26/24 11:00, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:31:06AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 1/19/24 00:00, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> 
>>> +		gpu-thermal {
>>> +			polling-delay-passive = <250>;
>>> +			polling-delay = <1000>;
>>
>> Hm, did tsens only gain support of non-polled reporting with 8450?
>>
>> If not, we should definitely update all the relevant SoCs.
> 
> Did you determine whether the interrupts work as expected?

Yes, they seem to!

> 
> We don't want to be polling here unless we have to (i.e. polling-delay
> should be 0 as per the binding).

Even better:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240125-topic-thermal-v1-0-3c9d4dced138@linaro.org/

Believe me, I'm not omitting you from Cc on purpose.. I usually
realize I forgot right after pressing enter on "do you really
wanna send"..

Konrad