lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240126-confirm-jawless-dca60fc9afce@spud>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 16:32:39 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: mailbox: fsl,mu: add i.MX95
 Generic/ELE/V2X MU compatible

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 02:29:14PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>  examples:
> @@ -134,3 +159,34 @@ examples:
>          interrupts = <GIC_SPI 176 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>          #mbox-cells = <2>;
>      };
> +
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> +    mu2: mailbox@...b0000 {
> +        compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu";
> +        reg = <0x445b0000 0x10000>;
> +        ranges;
> +        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 226 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <1>;
> +        #mbox-cells = <2>;
> +
> +        sram@...b1000 {
> +            compatible = "mmio-sram";
> +            reg = <0x445b1000 0x400>;
> +            ranges = <0x0 0x445b1000 0x400>;
> +            #address-cells = <1>;
> +            #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +            scmi_buf0: scmi-sram-section@0 {

If you are resending, the labels here for the section nodes are not used
and should be dropped. Ditto the "mu2" label above.

Otherwise, this looks okay to me.

Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Thanks,
Conor.

> +                compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem";
> +                reg = <0x0 0x80>;
> +            };
> +
> +            scmi_buf1: scmi-sram-section@80 {
> +                compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem";
> +                reg = <0x80 0x80>;
> +            };
> +        };
> +    };
> 
> -- 
> 2.37.1
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ