[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024012705-railcar-hermit-1d3b@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:10:24 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>
Cc: jirislaby@...nel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, cniedermaier@...electronics.com,
hugo@...ovil.com, m.brock@...mierlo.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
LinoSanfilippo@....de, lukas@...ner.de, p.rosenberger@...bus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Fixes and improvements for RS485
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 03:11:46PM +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> The following series includes some fixes and improvements around RS485 in
> the serial core and UART drivers:
>
> Patch 1: serial: Do not hold the port lock when setting rx-during-tx GPIO
> Patch 2: serial: core: set missing supported flag for RX during TX GPIO
> Patch 3: serial: core: fix sanitizing check for RTS settings
> Patch 4: serial: core: make sure RS485 cannot be enabled when it is not
> supported
> Patch 5: serial: core, imx: do not set RS485 enabled if it is not supported
> Patch 6: serial: omap: do not override settings for RS485 support
> Patch 7: serial: 8250_exar: Set missing rs485_supported flag
>
> Changes in v8:
> - remove wrong setting of SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX introduced with patch
> version 7 (pointed out by Ilpo)
> - fix commit message as pointed out by Ilpo
Aren't these already in the tree? None of them apply, what am I doing
wrong?
confused,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists