linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Don't use FORCE_STOP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:51:10 +0100
From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Inki Dae <daeinki@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
 Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
 Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Jonas Karlman
 <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
 Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
 Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Don't use FORCE_STOP_STATE

On 29.01.24 10:20, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> On 26.01.24 19:28, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> Just FYI this conflictted pretty heavily with drm-misc-next changes in
>> the same area, someone should check drm-tip has the correct
>> resolution, I'm not really sure what is definitely should be.
>>
>> Dave.
> 
> Thanks! I took a quick look at what is now in Linus' tree and it looks
> correct to me. The only thing I'm missing is my Reviewed-by tag which
> got lost somewhere, but I can get over that.

Apparently I missed the point here. I was looking at the wrong trees
(drm-next and master instead of drm-misc-next and drm-tip). Sorry for
the noise. Michael already pointed out the correct details.