[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c29848d6-29ca-4338-bbdc-abdc71cdd5f4@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:01:53 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Hu.Yadi" <hu.yadi@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kselftest-fixes tree with the
mm-hotfixes tree
On 1/28/24 14:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kselftest-fixes tree got a conflict in:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 27a593e3f13a ("selftests: core: include linux/close_range.h for CLOSE_RANGE_* macros")
>
> from the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch of the mm-hotfixes tree and commit:
>
> b5a8a6de69bc ("selftests/core: Fix build issue with CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE")
>
> from the kselftest-fixes tree.
>
> I fixed it up (basically the same patch, I used the former which kept
> the blank line) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
> as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
> be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
Thank you Stephen.
Andrew, would you like me to drop this commit? I was planning to send
pull request with this in later on today, but if you prefer, I can
drop this commit and the send the PR.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists