[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240129142843.982dd12d63dc2d86a1e415ec@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:28:43 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Hu.Yadi" <hu.yadi@....com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Muhammad Usama Anjum
<usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kselftest-fixes tree with the
mm-hotfixes tree
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:01:53 -0700 Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 1/28/24 14:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kselftest-fixes tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 27a593e3f13a ("selftests: core: include linux/close_range.h for CLOSE_RANGE_* macros")
> >
> > from the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch of the mm-hotfixes tree and commit:
> >
> > b5a8a6de69bc ("selftests/core: Fix build issue with CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE")
> >
> > from the kselftest-fixes tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (basically the same patch, I used the former which kept
> > the blank line) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
> > as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
> > be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> > merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> > of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> >
>
> Thank you Stephen.
>
> Andrew, would you like me to drop this commit? I was planning to send
> pull request with this in later on today, but if you prefer, I can
> drop this commit and the send the PR.
It was in the batch of hotfixes I sent to Linus yesterday.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists