| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAAH4kHaw7Cpq713sPW2-+TTzmy41O8qHRKYsG2MO06vF1eSJaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:04:04 -0800
From: Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86/sev: Extend the config-fs attestation support
for an SVSM
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:02 AM Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com> wrote:
>
> On 1/26/24 19:27, Dionna Amalie Glaze wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 2:19 PM Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >> When an SVSM is present, the guest can also request attestation reports
> >> from the SVSM. These SVSM attestation reports can be used to attest the
> >> SVSM and any services running within the SVSM.
> >>
> >> Extend the config-fs attestation support to allow for an SVSM attestation
> >> report. This involves creating four (4) new config-fs attributes:
> >>
> >> - 'svsm' (input)
> >> This attribute is used to determine whether the attestation request
> >> should be sent to the SVSM or to the SEV firmware.
> >
> > This is where I'm torn. If there's an SVSM, it's there to provide
> > paravirtualization for unenlightened guests /or/ it's there to protect
>
> An SVSM is for enlightened guests. A para-visor would be for unenlightened
> guests.
>
> > runtime measurement registers. I don't see there being any particular
> > value in bifurcating the attestation report space by adding this
> > option. If there's an SVSM present, the configfs-tsm report should
> > return the full SVSM attestation only.
>
> I don't necessarily agree with that. The guest should still be able to
> request a traditional attestation report.
>
> Maybe I can remove the SVSM attribute and direct the call based on
> requested VMPL level. If VMPL0 is requested, it goes through the SVSM.
> If VMPL1+ is requested, it goes to the ASP.
>
> That would mean that the privlevel_floor would need to stay at zero.
>
> >
> >>
> >> - 'service_guid' (input)
> >> Used for requesting the attestation of a single service within the
> >> SVSM. A null GUID implies that the SVSM_ATTEST_SERVICES call should
> >> be used to request the attestation report. A non-null GUID implies
> >> that the SVSM_ATTEST_SINGLE_SERVICE call should be used.
> >>
> >> - 'service_version' (input)
> >> Used with the SVSM_ATTEST_SINGLE_SERVICE call, the service version
> >> represents a specific service manifest version be used for the
> >> attestation report.
> >
> > I know that this is specified for the SVSM, but I still don't know
> > what the intended use case is such that we wouldn't simply always
> > return the full service manifest.
> > I can see an argument for an evidence requester not being ready for a
> > new manifest version and wanting the older version until they can
> > bridge the gap. I don't see that as needing configuration from the
> > user space. We can either require new service GUIDs for new versions,
> > require manifest ABIs to be internally versioned to be additive-only
> > to not break verifiers that understand up to manifest byte X, or we
> > allow breaking version changes through control plane configuration
> > that's passed directly to the SVSM.
> >
> > New versions get new GUIDs allows for gradual deprecation at the
> > expense of size. I think that is a reasonable trade-off to keep from
> > making tsm/report vendor-specific.
>
> This was requested and discussed during the SVSM spec review and there
> were no objections raised. See the this thread where this was discussed:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-coco/09819cb3-1938-fe86-b948-28aaffbe584e@amd.com/
>
We also hadn't had the configfs-tsm unification point, so I think it's
worth folding in that discussion.
In terms of querying specific services, would you help me with a
concrete example of where the evidence collector ought to query a
specific version instead of the service enumeration?
> The changes you're requesting would require a new version of the spec
> and updates to the protocol.
>
I think the changes I'm requesting are to just limit the exposure of
the protocol to linux. What specifically about what I wrote requires a
change to the spec? Is it the lack of plural handling of 'its GUID
value' in "Each service will document its GUID value and the format of
its manifest content."?
> >
> >>
> >> - 'manifestblob' (output)
> >> Used to return the service manifest associated with the attestation
> >> report.
> >
> > Given the above, I think we can just append the manifest to the report
> > since the report size is known a priori.
>
> We could have theoretically done the same thing with the auxblob (certs
> data), but that is separate. I prefer the idea of having an individual
> entry per piece of data being returned.
Fair enough, another RO blob seems okay enough.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm | 55 ++++++++++
> >> arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h | 31 +++++-
> >> arch/x86/kernel/sev.c | 50 +++++++++
> >> drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c | 95 +++++++++++++++-
> >> include/linux/tsm.h | 11 ++
> >> 6 files changed, 376 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm b/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm
> >> index dd24202b5ba5..c5423987d323 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm
> >> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/configfs-tsm
> >> @@ -31,6 +31,21 @@ Description:
> >> Standardization v2.03 Section 4.1.8.1 MSG_REPORT_REQ.
> >> https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/epyc-technical-docs/specifications/56421.pdf
> >>
> >> +What: /sys/kernel/config/tsm/report/$name/manifestblob
> >> +Date: January, 2024
> >> +KernelVersion: v6.9
> >> +Contact: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
> >> +Description:
> >> + (RO) Optional supplemental data that a TSM may emit, visibility
> >> + of this attribute depends on TSM, and may be empty if no
> >> + manifest data is available.
> >> +
> >> + When @provider is "sev_guest" and the "svsm" attribute is set
> >> + this file contains the service manifest used for the SVSM
> >> + attestation report from Secure VM Service Module for SEV-SNP
> >> + Guests v1.00 Section 7.
> >> + https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/epyc-technical-docs/specifications/58019.pdf
> >> +
> >> What: /sys/kernel/config/tsm/report/$name/provider
> >> Date: September, 2023
> >> KernelVersion: v6.7
> >> @@ -80,3 +95,43 @@ Contact: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
> >> Description:
> >> (RO) Indicates the minimum permissible value that can be written
> >> to @privlevel.
> >> +
> >> +What: /sys/kernel/config/tsm/report/$name/svsm
> >> +Date: January, 2024
> >> +KernelVersion: v6.9
> >> +Contact: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
> >> +Description:
> >> + (WO) Attribute is visible if a TSM implementation provider
> >> + supports the concept of attestation reports for TVMs running
> >> + under an SVSM, like SEV-SNP. Specifying any non-zero value
> >> + implies that the attestation report should come from the SVSM.
> >> + Secure VM Service Module for SEV-SNP Guests v1.00 Section 7.
> >> + https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/epyc-technical-docs/specifications/58019.pdf
> >> +
> >> +What: /sys/kernel/config/tsm/report/$name/service_guid
> >> +Date: January, 2024
> >> +KernelVersion: v6.9
> >> +Contact: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
> >> +Description:
> >> + (WO) Attribute is visible if a TSM implementation provider
> >> + supports the concept of attestation reports for TVMs running
> >> + under an SVSM, like SEV-SNP. Specifying a empty or null GUID
> >> + (00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000) requests all active services
> >> + within the SVSM be part of the attestation report. Specifying
> >> + a non-null GUID requests an attestation report of just the
> >> + specified service using the manifest form specified by the
> >> + service_version attribute.
> >> + Secure VM Service Module for SEV-SNP Guests v1.00 Section 7.
> >> + https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/epyc-technical-docs/specifications/58019.pdf
> >> +
> >> +What: /sys/kernel/config/tsm/report/$name/service_version
> >> +Date: January, 2024
> >> +KernelVersion: v6.9
> >> +Contact: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
> >> +Description:
> >> + (WO) Attribute is visible if a TSM implementation provider
> >> + supports the concept of attestation reports for TVMs running
> >> + under an SVSM, like SEV-SNP. Indicates the service manifest
> >> + version requested for the attestation report.
> >> + Secure VM Service Module for SEV-SNP Guests v1.00 Section 7.
> >> + https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/epyc-technical-docs/specifications/58019.pdf
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> >> index b126e50a1358..4cafa92d1d3e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> >> @@ -194,6 +194,27 @@ struct svsm_pvalidate_call {
> >> struct svsm_pvalidate_entry entry[];
> >> };
> >>
> >> +/*
> >> + * The SVSM Attestation related structures
> >> + */
> >> +struct svsm_location_entry {
> >> + u64 pa;
> >> + u32 len;
> >> + u8 rsvd[4];
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +struct svsm_attestation_call {
> >> + struct svsm_location_entry report_buffer;
> >> + struct svsm_location_entry nonce;
> >> + struct svsm_location_entry manifest_buffer;
> >> + struct svsm_location_entry certificates_buffer;
> >> +
> >> + /* For attesting a single service */
> >> + u8 service_guid[16];
> >> + u32 service_version;
> >> + u8 rsvd[4];
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * SVSM protocol structure
> >> */
> >> @@ -217,6 +238,10 @@ struct svsm_call {
> >> #define SVSM_CORE_CREATE_VCPU 2
> >> #define SVSM_CORE_DELETE_VCPU 3
> >>
> >> +#define SVSM_ATTEST_CALL(x) ((1ULL << 32) | (x))
> >> +#define SVSM_ATTEST_SERVICES 0
> >> +#define SVSM_ATTEST_SINGLE_SERVICE 1
> >> +
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
> >> extern void __sev_es_ist_enter(struct pt_regs *regs);
> >> extern void __sev_es_ist_exit(void);
> >> @@ -287,6 +312,7 @@ void snp_set_wakeup_secondary_cpu(void);
> >> bool snp_init(struct boot_params *bp);
> >> void __init __noreturn snp_abort(void);
> >> int snp_issue_guest_request(u64 exit_code, struct snp_req_data *input, struct snp_guest_request_ioctl *rio);
> >> +int snp_issue_svsm_attestation_request(u64 call_id, struct svsm_attestation_call *input);
> >> void snp_accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
> >> u64 snp_get_unsupported_features(u64 status);
> >> u64 sev_get_status(void);
> >> @@ -316,7 +342,10 @@ static inline int snp_issue_guest_request(u64 exit_code, struct snp_req_data *in
> >> {
> >> return -ENOTTY;
> >> }
> >> -
> >> +static inline int snp_issue_svsm_attestation_request(u64 call_id, struct svsm_attestation_call *input)
> >> +{
> >> + return -ENOTTY;
> >> +}
> >> static inline void snp_accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end) { }
> >> static inline u64 snp_get_unsupported_features(u64 status) { return 0; }
> >> static inline u64 sev_get_status(void) { return 0; }
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> >> index 849df3aae4e1..83bc5efa8fcf 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> >> @@ -2378,6 +2378,56 @@ static int __init init_sev_config(char *str)
> >> }
> >> __setup("sev=", init_sev_config);
> >>
> >> +static void update_attestation_input(struct svsm_call *call, struct svsm_attestation_call *input)
> >> +{
> >> + /* If (new) lengths have been returned, propograte them up */
> >> + if (call->rcx_out != call->rcx)
> >> + input->manifest_buffer.len = call->rcx_out;
> >> +
> >> + if (call->rdx_out != call->rdx)
> >> + input->certificates_buffer.len = call->rdx_out;
> >> +
> >> + if (call->r8_out != call->r8)
> >> + input->report_buffer.len = call->r8_out;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +int snp_issue_svsm_attestation_request(u64 call_id, struct svsm_attestation_call *input)
> >> +{
> >> + struct svsm_attestation_call *attest_call;
> >> + struct svsm_call call = {};
> >> + unsigned long flags;
> >> + u64 attest_call_pa;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (!vmpl)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + local_irq_save(flags);
> >> +
> >> + call.caa = __svsm_get_caa();
> >> +
> >> + attest_call = (struct svsm_attestation_call *)call.caa->svsm_buffer;
> >> + attest_call_pa = __svsm_get_caa_pa() + offsetof(struct svsm_ca, svsm_buffer);
> >> +
> >> + memcpy(attest_call, input, sizeof(*attest_call));
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * Set input registers for the request and set RDX and R8 to known
> >> + * values in order to detect length values being returned in them.
> >> + */
> >> + call.rax = call_id;
> >> + call.rcx = attest_call_pa;
> >> + call.rdx = -1;
> >> + call.r8 = -1;
> >> + ret = svsm_protocol(&call);
> >> + update_attestation_input(&call, input);
> >> +
> >> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snp_issue_svsm_attestation_request);
> >> +
> >> int snp_issue_guest_request(u64 exit_code, struct snp_req_data *input, struct snp_guest_request_ioctl *rio)
> >> {
> >> struct ghcb_state state;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c b/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c
> >> index 1ff897913bf4..3693373c4227 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c
> >> @@ -783,6 +783,140 @@ struct snp_msg_cert_entry {
> >> u32 length;
> >> };
> >>
> >> +static int sev_svsm_report_new(struct tsm_report *report, void *data)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned int report_len, manifest_len, certificates_len;
> >> + void *report_blob, *manifest_blob, *certificates_blob;
> >> + struct svsm_attestation_call attest_call = {};
> >> + struct tsm_desc *desc = &report->desc;
> >> + unsigned int size;
> >> + bool try_again;
> >> + void *buffer;
> >> + u64 call_id;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * Allocate pages for the request:
> >> + * - Report blob (4K)
> >> + * - Manifest blob (4K)
> >> + * - Certificate blob (16K)
> >> + *
> >> + * Above addresses must be 4K aligned
> >> + */
> >> + report_len = SZ_4K;
> >> + manifest_len = SZ_4K;
> >> + certificates_len = SEV_FW_BLOB_MAX_SIZE;
> >> +
> >> +retry:
> >> + size = report_len + manifest_len + certificates_len;
> >> + buffer = alloc_pages_exact(size, __GFP_ZERO);
> >> + if (!buffer)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> + report_blob = buffer;
> >> + attest_call.report_buffer.pa = __pa(report_blob);
> >> + attest_call.report_buffer.len = report_len;
> >> +
> >> + manifest_blob = report_blob + report_len;
> >> + attest_call.manifest_buffer.pa = __pa(manifest_blob);
> >> + attest_call.manifest_buffer.len = manifest_len;
> >> +
> >> + certificates_blob = manifest_blob + manifest_len;
> >> + attest_call.certificates_buffer.pa = __pa(certificates_blob);
> >> + attest_call.certificates_buffer.len = certificates_len;
> >> +
> >> + attest_call.nonce.pa = __pa(desc->inblob);
> >> + attest_call.nonce.len = desc->inblob_len;
> >> +
> >> + if (guid_is_null(&desc->service_guid)) {
> >> + call_id = SVSM_ATTEST_CALL(SVSM_ATTEST_SERVICES);
> >> + } else {
> >> + export_guid(attest_call.service_guid, &desc->service_guid);
> >> + attest_call.service_version = desc->service_version;
> >> +
> >> + call_id = SVSM_ATTEST_CALL(SVSM_ATTEST_SINGLE_SERVICE);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + ret = snp_issue_svsm_attestation_request(call_id, &attest_call);
> >> + switch (ret) {
> >> + case SVSM_SUCCESS:
> >> + break;
> >> + case SVSM_ERR_INVALID_PARAMETER:
> >> + try_again = false;
> >> +
> >> + if (attest_call.report_buffer.len > report_len) {
> >> + report_len = PAGE_ALIGN(attest_call.report_buffer.len);
> >> + try_again = true;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (attest_call.manifest_buffer.len > manifest_len) {
> >> + manifest_len = PAGE_ALIGN(attest_call.manifest_buffer.len);
> >> + try_again = true;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (attest_call.certificates_buffer.len > certificates_len) {
> >> + certificates_len = PAGE_ALIGN(attest_call.certificates_buffer.len);
> >> + try_again = true;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* If one of the buffers wasn't large enough, retry the request */
> >> + if (try_again) {
> >> + free_pages_exact(buffer, size);
> >> + goto retry;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + ret = -EINVAL;
> >> + goto error;
> >> + case SVSM_ERR_BUSY:
> >> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> >> + goto error;
> >> + default:
> >> + pr_err_ratelimited("SVSM attestation request failed (%#x)\n", ret);
> >> + ret = -EINVAL;
> >> + goto error;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> + report_len = attest_call.report_buffer.len;
> >> + void *rbuf __free(kvfree) = kvzalloc(report_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!rbuf)
> >> + goto error;
> >> +
> >> + memcpy(rbuf, report_blob, report_len);
> >> + report->outblob = no_free_ptr(rbuf);
> >> + report->outblob_len = report_len;
> >> +
> >> + manifest_len = attest_call.manifest_buffer.len;
> >> + void *mbuf __free(kvfree) = kvzalloc(manifest_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!mbuf)
> >> + goto error;
> >> +
> >> + memcpy(mbuf, manifest_blob, manifest_len);
> >> + report->manifestblob = no_free_ptr(mbuf);
> >> + report->manifestblob_len = manifest_len;
> >> +
> >> + certificates_len = attest_call.certificates_buffer.len;
> >> + if (!certificates_len)
> >> + goto success;
> >> +
> >> + void *cbuf __free(kvfree) = kvzalloc(certificates_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!cbuf)
> >> + goto error;
> >> +
> >> + memcpy(cbuf, certificates_blob, certificates_len);
> >> + report->auxblob = no_free_ptr(cbuf);
> >> + report->auxblob_len = certificates_len;
> >> +
> >> +success:
> >> + ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> +error:
> >> + free_pages_exact(buffer, size);
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static int sev_report_new(struct tsm_report *report, void *data)
> >> {
> >> struct snp_msg_cert_entry *cert_table;
> >> @@ -797,6 +931,9 @@ static int sev_report_new(struct tsm_report *report, void *data)
> >> if (desc->inblob_len != SNP_REPORT_USER_DATA_SIZE)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> + if (desc->svsm)
> >> + return sev_svsm_report_new(report, data);
> >> +
> >> void *buf __free(kvfree) = kvzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!buf)
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c b/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c
> >> index d1c2db83a8ca..33fa26406bc6 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/tsm.c
> >> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static DECLARE_RWSEM(tsm_rwsem);
> >> * The attestation report format is TSM provider specific, when / if a standard
> >> * materializes that can be published instead of the vendor layout. Until then
> >> * the 'provider' attribute indicates the format of 'outblob', and optionally
> >> - * 'auxblob'.
> >> + * 'auxblob' and 'manifestblob'.
> >> */
> >>
> >> struct tsm_report_state {
> >> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct tsm_report_state {
> >> enum tsm_data_select {
> >> TSM_REPORT,
> >> TSM_CERTS,
> >> + TSM_MANIFEST,
> >> };
> >>
> >> static struct tsm_report *to_tsm_report(struct config_item *cfg)
> >> @@ -119,6 +120,77 @@ static ssize_t tsm_report_privlevel_floor_show(struct config_item *cfg,
> >> }
> >> CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(tsm_report_, privlevel_floor);
> >>
> >> +static ssize_t tsm_report_svsm_store(struct config_item *cfg,
> >> + const char *buf, size_t len)
> >> +{
> >> + struct tsm_report *report = to_tsm_report(cfg);
> >> + unsigned int val;
> >> + int rc;
> >> +
> >> + rc = kstrtouint(buf, 0, &val);
> >> + if (rc)
> >> + return rc;
> >> +
> >> + guard(rwsem_write)(&tsm_rwsem);
> >> + rc = try_advance_write_generation(report);
> >> + if (rc)
> >> + return rc;
> >> + report->desc.svsm = !!val;
> >> +
> >> + return len;
> >> +}
> >> +CONFIGFS_ATTR_WO(tsm_report_, svsm);
> >> +
> >> +static ssize_t tsm_report_service_guid_store(struct config_item *cfg,
> >> + const char *buf, size_t len)
> >> +{
> >> + struct tsm_report *report = to_tsm_report(cfg);
> >> + size_t guid_len;
> >> + int rc;
> >> +
> >> + guard(rwsem_write)(&tsm_rwsem);
> >> + rc = try_advance_write_generation(report);
> >> + if (rc)
> >> + return rc;
> >> +
> >> + /* Obtain the GUID string length */
> >> + guid_len = (len && buf[len - 1] == '\n') ? len - 1 : len;
> >> + if (guid_len && guid_len != UUID_STRING_LEN)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + if (guid_len == UUID_STRING_LEN) {
> >> + rc = guid_parse(buf, &report->desc.service_guid);
> >> + if (rc)
> >> + return rc;
> >> + } else {
> >> + report->desc.service_guid = guid_null;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return len;
> >> +}
> >> +CONFIGFS_ATTR_WO(tsm_report_, service_guid);
> >> +
> >> +static ssize_t tsm_report_service_version_store(struct config_item *cfg,
> >> + const char *buf, size_t len)
> >> +{
> >> + struct tsm_report *report = to_tsm_report(cfg);
> >> + unsigned int val;
> >> + int rc;
> >> +
> >> + rc = kstrtouint(buf, 0, &val);
> >> + if (rc)
> >> + return rc;
> >> +
> >> + guard(rwsem_write)(&tsm_rwsem);
> >> + rc = try_advance_write_generation(report);
> >> + if (rc)
> >> + return rc;
> >> + report->desc.service_version = val;
> >> +
> >> + return len;
> >> +}
> >> +CONFIGFS_ATTR_WO(tsm_report_, service_version);
> >> +
> >> static ssize_t tsm_report_inblob_write(struct config_item *cfg,
> >> const void *buf, size_t count)
> >> {
> >> @@ -163,6 +235,9 @@ static ssize_t __read_report(struct tsm_report *report, void *buf, size_t count,
> >> if (select == TSM_REPORT) {
> >> out = report->outblob;
> >> len = report->outblob_len;
> >> + } else if (select == TSM_MANIFEST) {
> >> + out = report->manifestblob;
> >> + len = report->manifestblob_len;
> >> } else {
> >> out = report->auxblob;
> >> len = report->auxblob_len;
> >> @@ -188,7 +263,7 @@ static ssize_t read_cached_report(struct tsm_report *report, void *buf,
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * A given TSM backend always fills in ->outblob regardless of
> >> - * whether the report includes an auxblob or not.
> >> + * whether the report includes an auxblob/manifestblob or not.
> >> */
> >> if (!report->outblob ||
> >> state->read_generation != state->write_generation)
> >> @@ -224,8 +299,10 @@ static ssize_t tsm_report_read(struct tsm_report *report, void *buf,
> >>
> >> kvfree(report->outblob);
> >> kvfree(report->auxblob);
> >> + kvfree(report->manifestblob);
> >> report->outblob = NULL;
> >> report->auxblob = NULL;
> >> + report->manifestblob = NULL;
> >> rc = ops->report_new(report, provider.data);
> >> if (rc < 0)
> >> return rc;
> >> @@ -252,6 +329,15 @@ static ssize_t tsm_report_auxblob_read(struct config_item *cfg, void *buf,
> >> }
> >> CONFIGFS_BIN_ATTR_RO(tsm_report_, auxblob, NULL, TSM_OUTBLOB_MAX);
> >>
> >> +static ssize_t tsm_report_manifestblob_read(struct config_item *cfg, void *buf,
> >> + size_t count)
> >> +{
> >> + struct tsm_report *report = to_tsm_report(cfg);
> >> +
> >> + return tsm_report_read(report, buf, count, TSM_MANIFEST);
> >> +}
> >> +CONFIGFS_BIN_ATTR_RO(tsm_report_, manifestblob, NULL, TSM_OUTBLOB_MAX);
> >> +
> >> #define TSM_DEFAULT_ATTRS() \
> >> &tsm_report_attr_generation, \
> >> &tsm_report_attr_provider
> >> @@ -265,6 +351,9 @@ static struct configfs_attribute *tsm_report_extra_attrs[] = {
> >> TSM_DEFAULT_ATTRS(),
> >> &tsm_report_attr_privlevel,
> >> &tsm_report_attr_privlevel_floor,
> >> + &tsm_report_attr_svsm,
> >> + &tsm_report_attr_service_guid,
> >> + &tsm_report_attr_service_version,
> >> NULL,
> >> };
> >>
> >> @@ -280,6 +369,7 @@ static struct configfs_bin_attribute *tsm_report_bin_attrs[] = {
> >> static struct configfs_bin_attribute *tsm_report_bin_extra_attrs[] = {
> >> TSM_DEFAULT_BIN_ATTRS(),
> >> &tsm_report_attr_auxblob,
> >> + &tsm_report_attr_manifestblob,
> >> NULL,
> >> };
> >>
> >> @@ -288,6 +378,7 @@ static void tsm_report_item_release(struct config_item *cfg)
> >> struct tsm_report *report = to_tsm_report(cfg);
> >> struct tsm_report_state *state = to_state(report);
> >>
> >> + kvfree(report->manifestblob);
> >> kvfree(report->auxblob);
> >> kvfree(report->outblob);
> >> kfree(state);
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/tsm.h b/include/linux/tsm.h
> >> index de8324a2223c..7c36b8448b4f 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/tsm.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/tsm.h
> >> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> >>
> >> #include <linux/sizes.h>
> >> #include <linux/types.h>
> >> +#include <linux/uuid.h>
> >>
> >> #define TSM_INBLOB_MAX 64
> >> #define TSM_OUTBLOB_MAX SZ_32K
> >> @@ -19,11 +20,17 @@
> >> * @privlevel: optional privilege level to associate with @outblob
> >> * @inblob_len: sizeof @inblob
> >> * @inblob: arbitrary input data
> >> + * @svsm: optional indicator of where to obtain the tsm report blob
> >> + * @service_guid: optional SVSM service guid to attest
> >> + * @service_version: optional SVSM service manifest version requested
> >> */
> >> struct tsm_desc {
> >> unsigned int privlevel;
> >> size_t inblob_len;
> >> u8 inblob[TSM_INBLOB_MAX];
> >> + bool svsm;
> >> + guid_t service_guid;
> >> + unsigned int service_version;
> >> };
> >>
> >> /**
> >> @@ -33,6 +40,8 @@ struct tsm_desc {
> >> * @outblob: generated evidence to provider to the attestation agent
> >> * @auxblob_len: sizeof(@auxblob)
> >> * @auxblob: (optional) auxiliary data to the report (e.g. certificate data)
> >> + * @manifestblob_len: sizeof(@manifestblob)
> >> + * @manifestblob: (optional) manifest data associated with the report
> >> */
> >> struct tsm_report {
> >> struct tsm_desc desc;
> >> @@ -40,6 +49,8 @@ struct tsm_report {
> >> u8 *outblob;
> >> size_t auxblob_len;
> >> u8 *auxblob;
> >> + size_t manifestblob_len;
> >> + u8 *manifestblob;
> >> };
> >>
> >> /**
> >> --
> >> 2.42.0
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
--
-Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists