linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add JH7100 SoC compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240129122651.4b3c7b8e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:26:51 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob
 Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>, Samin Guo
 <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>, Alexandre Torgue
 <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Maxime
 Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Giuseppe Cavallaro
 <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add
 JH7100 SoC compatible

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:51:43 +0200 Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > Well, b4 can do that:
> > 
> > https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/contributor/trailers.html
> > 
> > But i've no idea if the netdev tooling actual does.  
> 
> Jakub, please let me know how should we proceed further!
> 
> The problem is that we ended up with a RESEND to include a missing R-b
> tag from Rob, but afterwards we also got this new R-b from Krzysztof
> here.  If it's not possible for you to collect both tags, I could
> prepare a v5 to avoid having another RESEND.

First off, have another read of our rules:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#tl-dr
:)

IMHO forwarding the review tag to a newer version of the set yourself
(like I just did) is fine. None of the tooling I know checks if that
the person posting the tag matches the From: