linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add JH7100 SoC compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1fa5aeee-a205-438a-a0fa-54643ffa41d0@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 22:57:11 +0200
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
 Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
 Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add
 JH7100 SoC compatible

On 1/29/24 22:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:51:43 +0200 Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>> Well, b4 can do that:
>>>
>>> https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/contributor/trailers.html
>>>
>>> But i've no idea if the netdev tooling actual does.  
>>
>> Jakub, please let me know how should we proceed further!
>>
>> The problem is that we ended up with a RESEND to include a missing R-b
>> tag from Rob, but afterwards we also got this new R-b from Krzysztof
>> here.  If it's not possible for you to collect both tags, I could
>> prepare a v5 to avoid having another RESEND.
> 
> First off, have another read of our rules:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#tl-dr
> :)

Oh, net/net-next suffix is required, will make sure to add it next time!

The 24h period restriction is still applicable for a RESEND that is
meant to quickly fix a previous submission issue?

> IMHO forwarding the review tag to a newer version of the set yourself
> (like I just did) is fine. None of the tooling I know checks if that
> the person posting the tag matches the From:

Hmm, I didn't actually test, but according to the link Andrew posted
above, for b4 it might be necessary to make use of the
`--sloppy-trailers` flag:

"Accept trailers where the email address of the sender differs from the
email address found in the trailer itself."

Thanks,
Cristian