[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbcf1b06-2a65-4f87-b15a-583a668dfc1e@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:59:11 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, Cong Liu <liucong2@...inos.cn>,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fix memory leak in
amd_pmf_get_pb_data()
Hi,
On 1/28/24 11:45, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Thank you for your patch/series, I've applied this patch
>> (series) to my review-hans branch:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
>>
>> Note it will show up in the pdx86 review-hans branch once I've
>> pushed my local branch there, which might take a while.
>
> Will development interests grow for the application of known scripts
> also according to the semantic patch language?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?h=v6.8-rc1#n71
Markus,
I'm not sure what your question here is?
Is it: "Will coccinelle scripts be run as part of the regular patch
test/merge workflow?" then the answer is that there are no plans
that I'm aware of to do that at this moment.
If such a thing were to be done, IMHO it would be best to have one
of the existing CI systems like e.h. Intel's LKP test bot run this
on linux-next, or on all the trees LKP already monitors.
And it does sound like something interesting to do, but someone
would need to actually setup and maintain such a CI system.
If the question is: "Are patches generated by coccinelle welcome?"
then the answer is "Yes patches generated by coccinelle are very
much welcome".
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists