[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZbcGHoLZfqro7i8g@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:57:50 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Klara Modin <klarasmodin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, hbathini@...ux.ibm.com, piliu@...hat.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v3 01/14] kexec: split crashkernel reservation
code out from crash_core.c
On 01/28/24 at 02:28am, Klara Modin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2024-01-24 06:12, Baoquan He wrote:
> > And also add config item CRASH_RESERVE to control its enabling of the
> > codes. And update config items which has relationship with crashkernel
> > reservation.
> >
> > And also change ifdeffery from CONFIG_CRASH_CORE to CONFIG_CRASH_RESERVE
> > when those scopes are only crashkernel reservation related.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index 502986237cb6..a9243e0948a3 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_HOTPLUG
> > def_bool y
> > config ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_CRASHKERNEL_RESERVATION
> > - def_bool CRASH_CORE
> > + def_bool CRASH_RESEERVE
> > config PHYSICAL_START
> > hex "Physical address where the kernel is loaded" if (EXPERT || CRASH_DUMP)
>
> CRASH_RESEERVE is probably a typo and should be CRASH_RESERVE (with the
> former ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_CRASHKERNEL_RESERVATION isn't defined in my .config
> and `crashkernel=...` parameter has no effect).
You are right, thanks a lot. Will fix that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists