[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6900d000-ae30-436d-b3c0-5a734be23738@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:01:41 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc: peter.griffin@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, willmcvicker@...gle.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, tomasz.figa@...il.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: sysreg_peric1 needs a
clock
On 29/01/2024 11:45, André Draszik wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 21:00 -0600, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 6:19 PM André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Without the clock running, we can not access its registers, and now
>>> that we have it, we should add it here so that it gets enabled as
>>> and when needed.
>>>
>>
>> That sounds like this patch deserves "Fixes:" tag :) Other than that:
>
> I didn't add it, because at the time &sysreg_peric1 was added, the clock
> macro CLK_GOUT_PERIC1_SYSREG_PERIC1_PCLK didn't exist and &sysreg_peric1
> wasn't in use until this series here anyway.
> If this patch here gets backported to some older kernel due to the Fixes: tag,
> without the whole peric1 series, it wouldn't build. Therefore I left it out.
Clk patches don't have fixes tag, so Fixes for this alone would be
confusing.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists