linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] clk: samsung: gs101: don't CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED peric1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:03:35 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
 peter.griffin@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
 robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
 tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, willmcvicker@...gle.com,
 semen.protsenko@...aro.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
 tomasz.figa@...il.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] clk: samsung: gs101: don't CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED
 peric1_sysreg clock

On 27/01/2024 01:19, André Draszik wrote:
> Now that we have hooked it up in the DTS, we can drop the

Your driver patch cannot depend on DTS. Not for a new platform. I am
repeating this all the time last days...

> CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED from here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c
> index 7f6c3b52d9ff..d55ed64d0e29 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c
> @@ -3393,7 +3393,7 @@ static const struct samsung_gate_clock peric1_gate_clks[] __initconst = {
>  	GATE(CLK_GOUT_PERIC1_SYSREG_PERIC1_PCLK,
>  	     "gout_peric1_sysreg_peric1_pclk", "mout_peric1_bus_user",
>  	     CLK_CON_GAT_GOUT_BLK_PERIC1_UID_SYSREG_PERIC1_IPCLKPORT_PCLK,
> -	     21, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),

I don't understand. You just added this clock in this patchset. This
means that your patch #3 is incorrect.

Best regards,
Krzysztof