linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/185] 6.1.76-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <23a727d7-aba4-4c90-8052-4523a8a21e79@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:01:24 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
 sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
 conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com,
 SW-Mobile-Linux-Upstreaming <SW-Mobile-Linux-Upstreaming@...hange.nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/185] 6.1.76-rc1 review


On 30/01/2024 01:31, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 29/01/24 11:03 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.76 release.
>> There are 185 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:59:28 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.76-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
> 
> We see build regressions on Arm64, as reported by Naresh earlier, and 
> System/390:
> 
> -----8<-----
>    /builds/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c: In 
> function 'mlx5e_build_sq_param':
>    
> /builds/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c:994:53: error: 'MLX5_IPSEC_CAP_CRYPTO' undeclared (first use in this function)
>      994 |                     (mlx5_ipsec_device_caps(mdev) & 
> MLX5_IPSEC_CAP_CRYPTO);
>          |                                                     
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    
> /builds/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c:994:53: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>    make[7]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:250: 
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.o] Error 1
> ----->8-----
> 
> Bisection points to:
> 
>    commit 1288b23c9c528796ab656d2796705f52c5ffad8a
>    Author: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
>    Date:   Tue Dec 12 13:52:55 2023 +0200
> 
>        net/mlx5e: Allow software parsing when IPsec crypto is enabled
>        [ Upstream commit 20f5468a7988dedd94a57ba8acd65ebda6a59723 ]
> 
> 
> Reverting that commit made the build pass again.
> 
> Reproducers:
> 
>    tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm64 --toolchain gcc-13 
> --kconfig defconfig
>    tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch s390  --toolchain gcc-13 
> --kconfig defconfig
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

FWIW, I am observing the same build issue.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic