linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: add missing required clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240130-fragrance-disinfect-22cc1911bf48-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:01:09 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, 
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: add missing required clock

On 30.01.2024 12:11:44, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:31:32PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 22.01.2024 14:56:09, Conor Dooley wrote:
> 
> > > I think we already had this discussion on v1, where I said that the
> > > binding requires the clocks to be in that order, regardless of whether
> > > or not clock-names is provided. You feel more strongly about it than I
> > > do, so I will add them when I get around to sending a v3.
> > 
> > Yes, this discussion sounded very familiar to me, never mind. Keep it as
> > is, and let's get this binding and the CAN driver upstream!
> 
> BTW, I didn't see an ack on this nor do I see it in linux-next (yet).
> Are you expecting the patch to go with the rest via the clock tree,
> via the DT tree or will you be taking it with CAN stuff via netdev?
> 
> I can resend this one patch with a netdev appropriate subject prefix
> if you like.

Feel free to take the whole series via the clock tree.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)