linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: dts: qcom: qrb5165-rb5: add the Bluetooth node"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MderwyjSGL3vhFngSnsX2rA3Gy7UG+9UFxsgryTcvdjWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:12:43 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: dts: qcom: qrb5165-rb5: add the Bluetooth node"

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 3:27 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 30/01/2024 14:09, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >
> > This reverts commit 71a73864e144aadaa582fe8296ef73fcf3ea7377.
> >
> > The bluetooth module of the QCA6391 should be represented as consuming
> > the power outputs of the PMU and not the regulators that are PMU's
> > inputs. We will be able to model it this way (together with the WLAN
> > module) once the pwrseq subsystem gets upstream with a dedicated driver
> > for the PMU.
> >
> > Thankfully this change has no corresponding DT bindings yet so we can
> > safely revert adding the bluetooth node.
> >
> > Fixes: 71a73864e144 ("arm64: dts: qcom: qrb5165-rb5: add the Bluetooth node")
>
> I don't think that dropping more-or-less correct DTS nodes is a fix. A
> fix could be changing the less-correct DTS into fully-correct DTS.
>

This node was added this merge window, the bindings didn't make it.
It's not used anywhere AFAIK and a better version is coming.

I'm not going to insist but I think it's useless right now.

Bart