lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240130222536.GA2523173-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:25:36 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, andi.shyti@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	alim.akhtar@...sung.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, andre.draszik@...aro.org,
	peter.griffin@...aro.org, semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
	kernel-team@...roid.com, willmcvicker@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/28] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: add
 samsung,spi-fifosize property

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:01:10PM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/25/24 17:45, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 05:30:53PM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> >> On 1/25/24 17:26, Mark Brown wrote:
> > 
> >>> OK, so just the compatible is enough information then?
> > 
> >> For gs101, yes. All the gs101 SPI instances are configured with 64 bytes
> >> FIFO depths. So instead of specifying the FIFO depth for each SPI node,
> >> we can infer the FIFO depth from the compatible.
> > 
> > But this is needed for other SoCs?  This change is scattered through a
> 
> There are SoCs that have multiple instances of the SPI IP, and they
> configure them with different FIFO depths. See
> "samsung,exynosautov9-spi" for example: SPI0, SPI1, and SPI6 are
> configured by the SoC to use 256 bytes FIFO depths, while all the other
> 8 SPI instances use 64 bytes FIFOs. I tried to explain the entire logic
> of the series in another reply, see it here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/40ba9481-4aea-4a72-87bd-c2db319be069@linaro.org/T/#u

We have some common properties for fifo size. In fact, there was just a 
discussion recently on Samsung UART (Is that the same block?) about 
this. So if you do use a property here, use a common one.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ