linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] pidfd: implement PIDFD_THREAD flag for pidfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240131161053.GC2609@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:10:53 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] pidfd: implement PIDFD_THREAD flag for
 pidfd_open()

On 01/31, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 03:12:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > After this patch we can easily add another feature, pidfd_poll()
> > can add, say, POLLHUP to poll_flags if the pid is "dead".
> >
> > So the user can do
> >
> > 	poll(pidfd, { .revents = POLLHUP });
> >
> > and it will block until release_task() is called and this pid is
> > no longer in use (pid_task() == NULL).
> >
> > Do you think this can be useful?
>
> Yeah, I think this is something that people would find useful. IIUC, it
> would essentially allow them to do things like wait until a task has
> been waited upon

Exactly.

OK. I'll try to make the (hopefully simple) patch on top of this one
on Friday, if Tycho agrees with V3. Will be busy tomorrow.

> * systemd completely relying on pidfds to manage services to guard
>   against any pid races.
> * Extended dbus to allow authentication via pidfds.
> * Extended policy kit to enable secure authentication of processes via pidfds.
> * Language support for pidfds: Go, Rust etc.
> * An endless number of tools that added support for them.
> * glibc support for pidfd apis.
>
> There's a bunch more. That literally obliterated whole bug classes.

Thanks for this info!

Not that I ever thouhgt that pidfd is "useless", not at all, but as I said
(and as a Perl progammer ;) I simply do not know what people actually do with
pidfds ;)

Oleg.