[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240131161211.v3rhwidmdalfdvz7@bogus>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:12:11 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, cristian.marussi@....com,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, rafael@...nel.org,
morten.rasmussen@....com, lukasz.luba@....com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, nm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: scmi: Add boost frequency support
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 04:07:48PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
[...]
>
> root@...o:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq# cat boost policy*/boost
> 1
> 0
> 0
OK I admit, I wasn't aware of this per policy boost flag.
It must be enabled by default if it has any effect. Otherwise
it breaks the existing behaviour on all the SCMI based platforms.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists