[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZbqAl3gerwe2o6jy@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:17:11 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] Introduce cpu_dcache_is_aliasing() across all
architectures
So this is the third iteration and you still keep only sending patch
3 to the list. How is anyone supposed to review it if you don't send
them all the pieces?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists