[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64e4a411-f35b-4e29-89d5-310420df4884@efficios.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:59:31 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] Introduce cpu_dcache_is_aliasing() across all
architectures
On 2024-01-31 12:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So this is the third iteration and you still keep only sending patch
> 3 to the list. How is anyone supposed to review it if you don't send
> them all the pieces?
My bad. I was aiming for not spamming mailing lists on unrelated patches. I did
not CC linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org on the other patches. But the missing
context is just confusing. And I forgot to CC linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
on patch 3 as well.
You can find the entire series on lore:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240131162533.247710-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com/T/#t
I'll make sure to copy all lists for all patches in the next
round, namely:
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists