[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f8ca5f8-c958-8769-1433-a19c4067b074@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:52:31 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: mpatocka@...hat.com, heinzm@...hat.com, agk@...hat.com,
snitzer@...nel.org, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, song@...nel.org,
jbrassow@....redhat.com, neilb@...e.de, shli@...com, akpm@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] dm-raid: fix v6.7 regressions
Hi,
在 2024/01/31 9:28, Xiao Ni 写道:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 9:25 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Xiao Ni!
>>
>> 在 2024/01/31 8:29, Xiao Ni 写道:
>>> In my environment, the lvm2 regression test has passed. There are only
>>> three failed cases which also fail in kernel 6.6.
>>>
>>> ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvresize-fs-crypt.sh
>>> ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/pvck-dump.sh
>>> ### failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/select-report.sh
>>> ### 426 tests: 346 passed, 70 skipped, 0 timed out, 7 warned, 3 failed
>>> in 89:26.073
>>
>> Thanks for the test, this is greate news.
>>
>> Kuai
>>
>
> Hi Kuai
>
> Have you run mdadm regression tests based on this patch set?
Of course, I'm runing in my VM with loop devices.
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> Regards
> Xiao
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists