linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] dm-raid: fix v6.7 regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <08300170-aa41-79d1-09b4-a5c9f006007c@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:06:22 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
Cc: mpatocka@...hat.com, heinzm@...hat.com, agk@...hat.com,
 snitzer@...nel.org, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, song@...nel.org,
 jbrassow@....redhat.com, neilb@...e.de, shli@...com, akpm@...l.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
 yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] dm-raid: fix v6.7 regressions

Hi,

在 2024/01/31 10:52, Yu Kuai 写道:
> Hi,
> 
> 在 2024/01/31 9:28, Xiao Ni 写道:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 9:25 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Xiao Ni!
>>>
>>> 在 2024/01/31 8:29, Xiao Ni 写道:
>>>> In my environment, the lvm2 regression test has passed. There are only
>>>> three failed cases which also fail in kernel 6.6.
>>>>
>>>> ###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/lvresize-fs-crypt.sh
>>>> ###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/pvck-dump.sh
>>>> ###       failed: [ndev-vanilla] shell/select-report.sh
>>>> ### 426 tests: 346 passed, 70 skipped, 0 timed out, 7 warned, 3 failed
>>>>     in 89:26.073
>>>
>>> Thanks for the test, this is greate news.
>>>
>>> Kuai
>>>
>>
>> Hi Kuai
>>
>> Have you run mdadm regression tests based on this patch set?

BTW, I just make sure there are no new failed tests, however, there
looks like some tests are broken. For example:

04update-metadata:

++ /root/mdadm/mdadm --quiet -CR --assume-clean -e 0.90 /dev/md0 --level 
linear -n 4 -c 64 /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3 --auto=yes
++ rv=1
++ case $* in
++ cat /var/tmp/stderr
mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Invalid argument

04r1update:

++ /root/mdadm/mdadm --quiet -A /dev/md0 -U resync /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1
++ rv=1
++ case $* in
++ cat /var/tmp/stderr
mdadm: --update=resync not understood for 1.x metadata

Thanks,
Kuai

> 
> Of course, I'm runing in my VM with loop devices.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kuai
> 
>>
>> Regards
>> Xiao
>>
>> .
>>
> 
> .
>