lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:14:49 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Masami Hiramatsu
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] eventfs: get rid of dentry pointers without
 refcounts

On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 07:57:40 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> static int instance_rmdir(const char *name)
> {
>         struct trace_array *tr;
>         int ret;
> 
>         mutex_lock(&event_mutex);

Note, event_mutex prevents dynamic events from being created. No kprobe
can be added while the event_mutex is held (not to be confused with
eventfs_mutex).

>         mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
> 
>         ret = -ENODEV;
>         tr = trace_array_find(name);
>         if (tr)
>                 ret = __remove_instance(tr);
> 
>         mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
>         mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
> 
>         return ret;
> }

And

static int instance_mkdir(const char *name)
{
        struct trace_array *tr;
        int ret;

        mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
        mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);

        ret = -EEXIST;
        if (trace_array_find(name))
                goto out_unlock;

        tr = trace_array_create(name);

        ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(tr);

out_unlock:
        mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
        mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
        return ret;
}


The above functions would have been basically what would have been
called if I had created:

  echo foo >> make_instance
  echo '!foo' >> remove_instance

In fact, IIRC, I did do the above first, and then moved that code into
mkdir/rmdir. Such that the tracefs mkdir and rmdir were just helpers
and not real "mkdir" and "rmdir" routines. This isn't in git history
because it was done only on my local repository.

If you also notice, tracefs only allows mkdir/rmdir to be assigned to
one directory. Once it is assigned, no other directories can have mkdir
rmdir functionality.

 /sys/kernel/tracing/instances

is the *only* directory that can have mkdir rmdir on it.

__init struct dentry *tracefs_create_instance_dir(const char *name,
                                          struct dentry *parent,
                                          int (*mkdir)(const char *name),
                                          int (*rmdir)(const char *name))
{
        struct dentry *dentry;

        /* Only allow one instance of the instances directory. */
        if (WARN_ON(tracefs_ops.mkdir || tracefs_ops.rmdir))
                return NULL;

And IIRC, Al told me that if I released the locks, it's up to the above
functions to prevent the races from occurring. That is, no file can be
created or remove when the mkdir and rmdir are running. Which the
event_mutex prevents.

Basically, I freeze external file creation and deletion within
tracefs/eventfs when the above mkdir/rmdir is being executed, and
prevent rmdir if any file within it is open.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ