linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] efi/libstub: Add generic support for parsing mem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFZKM5wU8djcVBxDmnCJwV4Xpest6u1EbE=7wyLUUeUUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 17:28:22 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, 
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, 
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, 
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, 
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Conrad Grobler <grobler@...gle.com>, 
	Andri Saar <andrisaar@...gle.com>, Sidharth Telang <sidtelang@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] efi/libstub: Add generic support for parsing mem_encrypt=

On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 17:23, Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:32 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:05:04PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > Parse the mem_encrypt= command line parameter from the EFI stub if
> > > CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT=y, so that it can be passed to the early
> > > boot code by the arch code in the stub.
> >
> > I guess all systems which do memory encryption are EFI systems anyway so
> > we should not worry about the old ones...
>
> There is at least one non-EFI firmware supporting memory encryption:
> Oak stage0 firmware [0]. However, I think Ard's patch seems simple
> enough to adopt in non-EFI firmware(s) if needed. I merely wanted to
> point out the existence of non-EFI memory encryption systems for
> potential future cases (ex: reviewing more complex patches at the
> firmware interface).
>
> [0] https://github.com/project-oak/oak/tree/main/stage0_bin
>

The second patch in this series actually implements the mem_encrypt=
parsing for both EFI and non-EFI boot. I just broke this out in a
separate patch because it affects architectures other than x86.