linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: amba-pl011: Remove QDF2xxx workarounds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9e60d1ef-976d-4fed-aadf-2c76edf6ae6f@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 16:28:37 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: amba-pl011: Remove QDF2xxx workarounds

On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 03:48:08PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

> Right, sorry for the mess. It actually turned out that Qualcomm is apparently
> still using some of these internally and was interested in still keeping it
> alive, at least for the time being.. I mentioned this on another similarly-
> themed patch threads, but forgot this one.

> Should I submit a revert, or can this be dropped?

Might be as well to send the revert then if it's needed it's there?
It'd be good to get this fixed quickly due to the issue Nathan found,
that means it's pretty disruptive for testing if you're using platforms
with the pl011.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)