linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: exynos: Add SPI nodes for Exynos850

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 12:24:25 -0600
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, 
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, 
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, 
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: exynos: Add SPI nodes for Exynos850

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:56 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 01/02/2024 11:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:38:58 -0600, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> >> Some USI blocks can be configured as SPI controllers. Add corresponding
> >> SPI nodes to Exynos850 SoC device tree.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [3/3] arm64: dts: exynos: Add SPI nodes for Exynos850
> >       https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/98473b0d78caa5502b7eee05553ee168f0b0b424
>
> And dropped. You did not test it.
>

Right. Forgot to re-test it after re-shuffling the clocks. Sorry for
the hustle, I'll send v3 shortly.

> For some time, all Samsung SoCs and its variants are expected not to
> introduce any new `dtbs_check W=1` warnings. Several platforms, like all
> ARM64 Samsung SoCs, have already zero warnings, thus for such platforms
> it is extra easy for the submitter to validate DTS before posting a
> patch. The patch briefly looks like it is not conforming to this rule.
> Please confirm that you tested your patch and it does not introduce any
> new warnings (linux-next is decisive here).
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>