linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: exynos: Add SPI nodes for Exynos850

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPLW+4ke9AJ_7FkmqTsT7kQv3TWYW0_G2rc=RsSGVFuvX2qi-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 08:22:04 -0600
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, 
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, 
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, 
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: exynos: Add SPI nodes for Exynos850

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 4:31 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 25/01/2024 02:38, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > Some USI blocks can be configured as SPI controllers. Add corresponding
> > SPI nodes to Exynos850 SoC device tree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> >   - Sorted pinctrl properties properly
> >
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
> > index 618bc674896e..ca257da74b50 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
> > @@ -738,6 +738,24 @@ usi_spi_0: usi@...400c0 {
> >                                <&cmu_peri CLK_GOUT_SPI0_IPCLK>;
> >                       clock-names = "pclk", "ipclk";
> >                       status = "disabled";
> > +
> > +                     spi_0: spi@...40000 {
> > +                             compatible = "samsung,exynos850-spi";
> > +                             reg = <0x13940000 0x30>;
> > +                             interrupts = <GIC_SPI 221 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +                             pinctrl-0 = <&spi0_pins>;
> > +                             pinctrl-names = "default";
> > +                             clocks = <&cmu_peri CLK_GOUT_SPI0_IPCLK>,
> > +                                      <&cmu_peri CLK_GOUT_SPI0_PCLK>;
> > +                             clock-names = "spi_busclk0", "spi";
> > +                             samsung,spi-src-clk = <0>;
> > +                             dmas = <&pdma0 5>, <&pdma0 4>;
> > +                             dma-names = "tx", "rx";
> > +                             num-cs = <1>;
>
> For the future: please keep properties sorted by name, so clocks+name,
> dmas+name, interrupts, pinctrl+name, more-or-less matching DTS coding
> style. address/size cells can go to the end.
>

Noted, thanks! So IIUC, basically follow the order of properties
described at [1], but keep the standard/common properties block
sorted, and then keep vendor properties sorted, right?

[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>