lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f1691cd-fcc8-4a0b-9d63-bff15c5a52ad@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 13:24:48 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@...soc.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
 mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, longman@...hat.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, niuzhiguo84@...il.com, ke.wang@...soc.com,
 xuewen.yan@...soc.com, Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcu

On 2/1/24 11:48, Boqun Feng wrote:
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave():
>    lock_acquire():
>      __lock_acquire():
>        validate_chain():
>          lookup_chain_cache_add():
>            graph_lock();
> 
> Basically, every lock acquisition may lock the lockdep graph because
> of dependency checking.

Wouldn't it be simpler to make __lock_acquire() return early if
this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion) indicates that the graph lock is held?

Thanks,

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ