linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 04/18] dt-bindings: clock: mobileye,eyeq5-clk: add bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 11:38:31 +0100
From: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, "Gregory
 CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, "Michael Turquette"
 <mturquette@...libre.com>, "Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>, "Rob Herring"
 <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, "Linus Walleij"
 <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rafał Miłecki
 <rafal@...ecki.pl>, "Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "Vladimir Kondratiev" <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
 <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
 <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Thomas
 Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, "Tawfik Bayouk"
 <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/18] dt-bindings: clock: mobileye,eyeq5-clk: add
 bindings

Hello,

On Thu Feb 1, 2024 at 9:58 AM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 31/01/2024 17:26, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> > Add DT schema bindings for the EyeQ5 clock controller driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
> > ---
>
> No changelog, tags ignored, I scrolled through first two pages of cover
> letter and also no changelog.

In this case we fit into the "If a tag was not added on purpose". Sorry
the changelog was not explicit enough. In my mind it fits into the
first bullet point of the cover letter changelog:

> - Have the three drivers access MMIO directly rather than through the
>   syscon & regmap.

That change means important changes to the dt-bindings to adapt to this
new behavior. In particular we now have reg and reg-names properties
that got added and made required.

I wanted to have your review on that and did not want to tag the patch
as already reviewed.

>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
> provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
> can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
> the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
> version they apply.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

As an aside, what's your preference on location for this information?
Cover letter changelog? Following '---' in the specific commit message?
Somewhere else?

Thanks,

--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com