[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZbuEsltcMLNn4SyF@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 13:46:58 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Aahil Awatramani <aahila@...gle.com>
Cc: David Dillow <dillow@...gle.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: designware: allow fine tuning
tuning waveform from device tree
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 04:46:22AM +0000, Aahil Awatramani wrote:
> The Synopsys i2c driver allows a user to override the parameters
> controlling the waveform using ACPI; this is useful for fine tuning when
> needed to make spec compliance. Extend this support to the device tree to
> allow non-ACPI platforms the same capabilities.
DT has different counters from which one should derive these ones.
Can you explain why existing bindings may _not_ be utilised?
Without this very justification, NAK.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists