linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 00:20:38 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: deller@....de, arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:05 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:11:44PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:26:39AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > Masahiro, if there no issues feel free to take this or I can take them in
> > > too via the modules-next tree. Lemme know!
> >
> > I've queued this onto modules-testing to get winder testing [0]
>
> I've moved it to modules-next as I've found no issues.
>
>   Luis


I believe this patch series is wrong.



I thought we agreed that the alignment must be added to
individual asm code, not to the linker script.

I am surprised that you came back to this.







--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada