linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:23:21 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: deller@....de, arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 12:20:38AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:05 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:11:44PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:26:39AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > > Masahiro, if there no issues feel free to take this or I can take them in
> > > > too via the modules-next tree. Lemme know!
> > >
> > > I've queued this onto modules-testing to get winder testing [0]
> >
> > I've moved it to modules-next as I've found no issues.
> >
> >   Luis
> 
> 
> I believe this patch series is wrong.
> 
> I thought we agreed that the alignment must be added to
> individual asm code, not to the linker script.
>
> I am surprised that you came back to this.

I misseed the dialog on the old cover letter, sorry. I've yanked these patches
out. I'd expect a respin from Helge.

  Luis