[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25615f41-a725-4276-bc0a-a3e7fe47b864@linux.dev>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 10:10:45 -0800
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: merge two CONFIG_BPF entries
On 2/3/24 11:56 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 'config BPF' exists in both init/Kconfig and kernel/bpf/Kconfig.
>
> Commit b24abcff918a ("bpf, kconfig: Add consolidated menu entry for bpf
> with core options") added the second one to kernel/bpf/Kconfig instead
> of moving the existing one.
>
> Merge them together.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> init/Kconfig | 5 -----
> kernel/bpf/Kconfig | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 8d4e836e1b6b..46ccad83a664 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1457,11 +1457,6 @@ config SYSCTL_ARCH_UNALIGN_ALLOW
> config HAVE_PCSPKR_PLATFORM
> bool
>
> -# interpreter that classic socket filters depend on
> -config BPF
> - bool
> - select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA1
> -
> menuconfig EXPERT
> bool "Configure standard kernel features (expert users)"
> # Unhide debug options, to make the on-by-default options visible
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/Kconfig b/kernel/bpf/Kconfig
> index 6a906ff93006..bc25f5098a25 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/Kconfig
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> # BPF interpreter that, for example, classic socket filters depend on.
> config BPF
> bool
> + select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA1
Currently, the kernel/bpf directory is guarded with CONFIG_BPF
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF) += bpf/
in kernel/bpf/Makefile.
Your patch probably works since there are lots of some other BPF related
configurations which requires CONFIG_BPF. But maybe we sould
keep 'config BPF' in init/Kconfig and remove 'config BPF'
in kernel/bpf/Kconfig. This will be less confusing?
>
> # Used by archs to tell that they support BPF JIT compiler plus which
> # flavour. Only one of the two can be selected for a specific arch since
Powered by blists - more mailing lists