linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: gpio: Correct default GPIO state to LOW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 19:18:46 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: gpio: Correct default GPIO state to LOW

On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 1:23 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 06:41:31PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > Actually, Linux can read back the value just fine in output mode,
> > so what about just ignoring the property and update the document
> > to stop saying that about Linux?
>
> IIRC that was there because historically the gpiolib documentation
> said that this was unsupported (though the code never actually prevented
> you trying I think?) and will have made it's way through the DT
> conversion and refactoring of the bindings.

I have this gut feeling too but I can't find it!

Yours,
Linus Walleij