| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87ttmmu2nw.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 11:33:23 -0800
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
To: Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@...cle.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, pmladek@...e.com, peterz@...radead.org,
dianders@...omium.org, npiggin@...il.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
joao.m.martins@...cle.com, juerg.haefliger@...onical.com,
mic@...ikod.net, arnd@...db.de, ankur.a.arora@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] cpuidle/poll_state: replace cpu_relax with
smp_cond_load_relaxed
Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@...cle.com> writes:
>>>>> cpu_relax on ARM64 does a simple "yield". Thus we replace it with
>>>>> smp_cond_load_relaxed which basically does a "wfe".
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@...cle.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c b/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
>>>>> index 9b6d90a72601..440cd713e39a 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
>>>>> @@ -26,12 +26,16 @@ static int __cpuidle poll_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>>>>> limit = cpuidle_poll_time(drv, dev);
>>>>> - while (!need_resched()) {
>>>>> - cpu_relax();
>>>>> - if (loop_count++ < POLL_IDLE_RELAX_COUNT)
>>>>> - continue;
>>>>> -
>>>>> + for (;;) {
>>>>> loop_count = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + smp_cond_load_relaxed(¤t_thread_info()->flags,
>>>>> + (VAL & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED) ||
>>>>> + (loop_count++ >= POLL_IDLE_RELAX_COUNT));
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (loop_count < POLL_IDLE_RELAX_COUNT)
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +
>>>>> if (local_clock_noinstr() - time_start > limit) {
>>>>> dev->poll_time_limit = true;
>>>>> break;
>>>> Doesn't this make ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX a complete misnomer?
>>> This controls the build of poll_state.c and the generic definition of
>>> smp_cond_load_relaxed (used by x86) is using cpu_relax(). Do you propose
>>> other approach here?
>> Give it a better name? Having ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX control a piece of code
>> that doesn't use cpu_relax() doesn't make sense to me.
>
> The generic code for smp_cond_load_relaxed is using cpu_relax and this one is
> used on x86 - so ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX is a prerequisite on x86 when using
> haltpoll. Only on ARM64 this is overwritten. Moreover ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX is
> controlling the function definition for cpuidle_poll_state_init (this is how it
> was originally designed).
I suspect Will's point is that the term ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX doesn't make
a whole lot of sense when we are only indirectly using cpu_relax() in
the series.
Also, all archs define cpu_relax() (though some as just a barrier()) so
ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX .
Maybe an arch can instead just opt into polling in idle?
Perhaps something like this trivial patch:
--
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 5edec175b9bf..d80c98c64fd4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ config ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC
config GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY
def_bool y
-config ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX
+config ARCH_WANTS_IDLE_POLL
def_bool y
config ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 55437f5e0c3a..6a0a1f16a5c3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
#include <asm/cpu.h>
#endif
-#define ACPI_IDLE_STATE_START (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX) ? 1 : 0)
+#define ACPI_IDLE_STATE_START (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_IDLE_POLL) ? 1 : 0)
static unsigned int max_cstate __read_mostly = ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER;
module_param(max_cstate, uint, 0400);
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_cstates(struct acpi_processor *pr)
if (max_cstate == 0)
max_cstate = 1;
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX)) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_IDLE_POLL)) {
cpuidle_poll_state_init(drv);
count = 1;
} else {
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/Makefile b/drivers/cpuidle/Makefile
index d103342b7cfc..23f48d99f0f2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/Makefile
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ obj-y += cpuidle.o driver.o governor.o sysfs.o governors/
obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED) += coupled.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DT_IDLE_STATES) += dt_idle_states.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DT_IDLE_GENPD) += dt_idle_genpd.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX) += poll_state.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_IDLE_POLL) += poll_state.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HALTPOLL_CPUIDLE) += cpuidle-haltpoll.o
##################################################################################
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
index 3183aeb7f5b4..53e55a91d55d 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static inline void cpuidle_coupled_parallel_barrier(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
}
#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE) && defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX)
+#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE) && defined(CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_IDLE_POLL)
void cpuidle_poll_state_init(struct cpuidle_driver *drv);
#else
static inline void cpuidle_poll_state_init(struct cpuidle_driver *drv) {}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists