[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1h6impo5p.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 17:02:12 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Fullway Wang <fullwaywang@...look.com>
Cc: bootc@...tc.net, martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fullwaywang@...cent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target: sbp: integer overflow and potential memory
corruption
Fullway,
> The code in sbp_make_tpg() is confusing because tpgt was limited
> to UINT_MAX but the datatype of tpg->tport_tpgt is actually u16.
> Correctly fix the data type problem to avoid integer overflow.
>
> This is similar to CVE-2015-4036 in the sense that sbp is a clone
> of vhost/scsi, and the bug was inherited but never fixed.
> +#define SBP_MAX_TARGET 256
Why 256?
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists