[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240205022500.2232124-1-qyousef@layalina.io>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 02:25:00 +0000
From: Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Change default transition delay to 2ms
10ms is too high for today's hardware, even low end ones. This default
end up being used a lot on Arm machines at least. Pine64, mac mini and
pixel 6 all end up with 10ms rate_limit_us when using schedutil, and
it's too high for all of them.
Change the default to 2ms which should be 'pessimistic' enough for worst
case scenario, but not too high for platforms with fast DVFS hardware.
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 44db4f59c4cc..8207f7294cb6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -582,11 +582,11 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
* for platforms where transition_latency is in milliseconds, it
* ends up giving unrealistic values.
*
- * Cap the default transition delay to 10 ms, which seems to be
+ * Cap the default transition delay to 2 ms, which seems to be
* a reasonable amount of time after which we should reevaluate
* the frequency.
*/
- return min(latency * LATENCY_MULTIPLIER, (unsigned int)10000);
+ return min(latency * LATENCY_MULTIPLIER, (unsigned int)(2*MSEC_PER_SEC));
}
return LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists