[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8714b420-58b9-4d5b-a489-31670c8d325f@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 14:08:31 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>, Lee Jones
<lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
Cc: mazziesaccount@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: Update pattern property case
On 05/02/2024 12:02, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> Driver expects regulator child node in upper case.
> Hence align with the same.
Did the driver have DT support before? I think no, so why aligning that
way? I would argue that driver should be aligned with bindings, the
moment you add DT for the first time.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists