linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] leds: trigger: netdev: Fix kernel panic on interface rename trig notify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <65c0e874.df0a0220.257a.43b1@mx.google.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 14:53:53 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
	Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: trigger: netdev: Fix kernel panic on interface
 rename trig notify

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 02:41:46PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > This should have 'net' in the subject line, to indicate which tree its
> > > for.
> > 
> > No, it shouldn't.
> > 
> > Contributors aren't obliged to know anything about merging strategies.
> 
> With netdev, we tend to assume they do, or at least can contribute to
> the discussion. They often know about any dependencies etc which could
> influence the decision. When there are multiple subsystem maintainers
> involved, i tend to use To: to indicate the maintainer i think should
> merge the patch, and Cc: for the rest.
>

I'm always a bit confused when I have to send patch to mixed subsystem
(not the case but for net trigger it's almost that). Sorry for the
confusion/noise.

> > Why does this need to go in via net?
> 
> It does not, as far as i'm aware. Christian, do you know of any
> reason?
> 

This is strictly a fix, no dependency or anything like that. Maybe using
net as target would make this faster to merge (since net is for fix only
and this has to be backported) than using leds-next?

Again if needed I can send v2 with the correct tag for net subsystem if
better.

-- 
	Ansuel