lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240206073759.4d948d1e@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 07:37:59 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Michal Swiatkowski
 <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>, Marcin Szycik
 <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>, Wojciech Drewek
 <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Andy
 Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, "Rasmus Villemoes"
 <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Jiri
 Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Przemek Kitszel
 <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "Simon Horman" <horms@...nel.org>,
 <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
 <ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
 <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/21] ice: add PFCP filter support

On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:46:44 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > Add support for creating PFCP filters in switchdev mode. Add pfcp module
> > that allows to create a PFCP-type netdev. The netdev then can be passed to
> > tc when creating a filter to indicate that PFCP filter should be created.  
> 
> I believe folks agreed that bitmap_{read,write}() should stay inline,
> ping then?

It's probably fine, IMHO. I mean, I think we agree that the rarely used
inlines should not sit in a header included by half of the kernel (not
an exaggeration). But IMHO a better fix would be to move out whatever
cpumask.h xarray.h and other common headers depend on to a cut-down
version rather than making your helpers not inline.

So I think all we need for now is for people to ack the respective
patches? Looks like cio and ntfs and missing acks, so are some of 
the bitops core patches.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ