lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 14:10:05 +0530
From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
To: <nm@...com>, <kristo@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Vaishnav Achath
	<vaishnav.a@...com>
CC: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, <bb@...com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-mcu/wakeup: Disable MCU and wakeup R5FSS nodes

Hi Vaishnav Achath,

On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 19:10:17 +0530, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
> K3 Remoteproc R5 driver requires reserved memory carveouts and
> mailbox configuration to instantiate the cores successfully.
> Since this is a board level dependency, keep the R5 subsytem
> disabled at SoC dtsi, otherwise it results in probe errors like
> below during AM62P SK boot:
> 
> r5fss@...00000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
> r5fss@...00000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22
> r5fss@...00000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
> r5fss@...00000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22
> 
> [...]

I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-dts-next on [1].
Thank you!

[1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-mcu/wakeup: Disable MCU and wakeup R5FSS nodes
      commit: dfc90e5f1a0fe0f8124521bc1911e38aa6cd9118

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git
--
Vignesh


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ